Skinner’s Field & Trial Light & Senior – Complete Dry Dog Food, Ideal for Older, Overweight or Less Active Dogs, 15kg

Product Information

She is estranged from her ex-husband, and came to the UK in 2006. She has two sons, aged 29 and 33, who live with their father in the Philippines, and she also has one sister there, who has her own family, although the refusal letter refers to two sisters in that country. I do not consider that there would be very significant obstacles to her integration into the Philippines on return, because that is the country where she has spent most of her adult life, and she confirms that she still has family relations in that country. For this reason we've calculated the approximate 'as fed' percentages for the main ingredient categories in the finished product. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law and is set aside. The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be decided de novo by a Judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge Sweet. The Appellant was born on 2 November 1969 and left school at 17 because she was pregnant with her first son. She had a second son a few years later. They are now 34 and 29 and continue to live with their father. Carb-rich ingredients: includes all ingredients derived from grains, pseudo-grains, potatoes and other starchy root vegetables, sweet potato and legumes (except whole peas which are categorised under fruit and veg) except for isolated protein and extracted oils. Also includes fibre supplements.

The scope of the evidence in this case is relatively narrow. Notwithstanding that however I am setting aside the FTT Decision as a whole and the appeal will have to be re-determined anew. Moreover, the failure in this case is a failure to give reasons, which forms part of the duty to act fairly. On balance, and having regard to Part 3 of the Tribunal’s Practice Direction and paragraph 7 of the Practice Statement, as well as the guidance given in the reported decision of Begum (Remaking or remittal) Bangladesh [2023] UKUT 46 (IAC), it therefore seems to me more appropriate to remit this appeal for redetermination in the FTT. The Appellant accordingly contended in her application and her appeal to the FTT that she had been in the UK for 17 years (at the date of the hearing before the FTT) and would face very significant obstacles to her reintegration into the Philippines and is thus entitled to leave pursuant to paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi) of the Immigration Rules, or, alternatively outside of the Rules pursuant to Article 8 ECHR.Mr Krushner placed the least emphasis on this ground in his oral submissions, and I consider he was right to do so. The Judge has plainly taken into account the length of time for which the Appellant has been here in para. 10. Indeed, he records expressly in that paragraph that she has been here since 2006. This ground is accordingly predicated on a misreading of the FTT Decision and is rejected. a. In relation to Ground 1, the Judge gave adequate reasons, namely that the Appellant was working illegally in the UK and has received the support of friends. c. Ground 3: The Judge has failed to take into account the fact that the Appellant has been in the UK for 17 years. Chances are you probably know all there is to know about Chemist Direct, but if you don’t then here’s a little more detail about them. The Appellant is a national of the Philippines. She appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Sweet (“the Judge”) promulgated on 22 June 2023 (“the FTT Decision”) dismissing her appeal against the Respondent’s refusal dated 6 February 2023 of her human rights claim. That claim was based on her private life under Article 8 ECHR, built up during her long residence in the UK, it being agreed that she has been here since 19 February 2006.

The FTT Decision is very short. Before turning to that, it is therefore necessary to set out the essence of the Appellant’s case. Her evidence, as set out in her witness statement, can be summarised as follows. The Appellant was close to her mother, who was a British citizen, as was her mother’s husband. It is unclear to me on what basis her mother was a British citizen, but I assume that the Appellant has sought the necessary advice to ensure that she did not either acquire British citizenship by descent when she was born, or is otherwise entitled to it. With a formulation that includes reduced levels of fat and protein, Light & Senior is an ideal diet for any dog that needs dietary support (in addition to exercise and other lifestyle management!) to maintain a healthy weight and body condition. This diet can be fed both in meals and as treats as a holistic weight management strategy using its specially shaped kibble to help hunger stay away. I did not accept the appellant’s evidence that she had not made an earlier application for leave to remain because of difficulties with the dates on her respective passports, or that she had insufficient funds for such an application. She has not only over-stayed her visa, but has also been working in a child-minding/domestic capacity, contrary to the Rules. She has blatantly ignored the Immigration Rules of the UK, and now attempts to remain in the UK on the basis of her evidence, which is as follows.

I put to Mr Krushner at the hearing whether, even if the Appellant had no family in the Philippines, her case would surmount the very significant obstacles threshold. Mr Krushner submitted that it at least could do, such that the issue is material. I have not found the question of the materiality of this error very straightforward. On any view, this is far from a strong claim for leave pursuant to paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi), but, having regard to the broad evaluative assessment that must be undertaken in determining whether there are very significant obstacles (see Kamara v SSHD [2016] EWCA Civ 813; [2016] 4 WLR 152 at [14] per Sales LJ, as he then was), and given that I have not heard the evidence, I am not satisfied that this is an error which can be said to reach the high threshold of immateriality recently reaffirmed in ASO (Iraq) v SSHD [2023] EWCA Civ 1282 at [43]. Field & Trial Light & Senior is a complete working dog food specially developed and formulated for senior dogs, those with lower energy requirements and adult dogs who are prone to weight gain.